User talk:FvomEnde

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to ProofWiki! Since you're new, you may want to check out the general help page. It's the best first stop to see how things are done (next to reading proofs, of course!). Please feel free to contribute to whichever area of mathematics interests you, either by adding new proofs, or fixing up existing ones. If you have any questions please feel free to contact one of the administrators, or post your question on the questions page.

Here are some useful pages to help get you started:

  • Community Portal - To see what needs to be done, and keep up to date with the community.
  • Recent Changes - To keep up with what's new, and what's being added.
  • Check out our house style if you are keen on contributing.
  • Main Page talk - This is where most of the main discussions regarding the direction of the site take place. If you have any ideas, please share them!

Cheers! prime mover (talk) 05:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your latest contribution

A fine result presented well.

Please do not feel badly about any edits made to your post. Most of what is being done relates to code layout and further $\LaTeX$ shortcuts that have been developed, e.g. \ds for \displaystyle (which saves significant fingerwork). Also note that within the eqn environment, \displaystyle is already automatically invoked for most of the parameters (deliberatly so, to save on page size), so can be removed.

Other stuff is just "that is how we do it on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$" -- which is very close to what you produced already.

Thank you for a good contribution, and please feel welcome. --prime mover (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome! Of course I'm not too familiar with the "standard notation" and general house rules yet, so I appreciate you giving a site beginner like me a hand! I did study the exact changes you made in the code and I'll do my best to keep them in mind for future contributions --FvomEnde (talk) 17:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
There's a few other things which I will get to in due course: \struct rather than \tuple for structures, even though a structure is a tuple, but domestic issues are summoning me to be attended to. --prime mover (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)