Relation equals Inverse iff Symmetric
From ProofWiki
Contents |
Theorem
A relation $\mathcal R$ is symmetric iff it equals its inverse:
- $\mathcal R^{-1} = \mathcal R$
Proof
Suppose $\mathcal R \subseteq S \times S$ is symmetric.
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\) | \(\displaystyle \left({y, x}\right) \in \mathcal R^{-1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\implies\) | \(\displaystyle \left({x, y}\right) \in \mathcal R\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of Inverse Relation | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\implies\) | \(\displaystyle \left({y, x}\right) \in \mathcal R\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of Symmetric Relation |
Thus $\mathcal R^{-1} \subseteq \mathcal R$ and, from Inverse Relation Equal iff Subset, $\mathcal R^{-1} = \mathcal R$.
Now suppose $\mathcal R^{-1} = \mathcal R$.
Thus:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\) | \(\displaystyle \left({x, y}\right) \in \mathcal R\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\implies\) | \(\displaystyle \left({x, y}\right) \in \mathcal R^{-1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | as $\mathcal R^{-1} = \mathcal R$ | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\implies\) | \(\displaystyle \left({y, x}\right) \in \mathcal R\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of Inverse Relation |
... so $\mathcal R$ is symmetric by the definition of a Symmetric Relation.
$\blacksquare$
Comment
Some sources use this definition:
- $\left\{{\left({t, s}\right): \left({s, t}\right) \in \mathcal R}\right\} = \mathcal R$
as the definition of a symmetric relation.
Sources
- Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory (1960)... (previous)... (next): $\S 10$: Inverses and Composites
- Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology (1964)... (previous)... (next): Introduction to Set Theory: $1$. Elementary Operations on Sets
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965)... (previous)... (next): Exercise $10.6 \ \text{(b)}$
- George McCarty: Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups (1967): Chapter $\text{I}$
- Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr.: Counterexamples in Topology (1970)... (previous)... (next): $\text{I}: \ \S 5$: Uniformities