Well-Ordering is Total Ordering
Theorem
Let $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be a well-ordered set.
Then:
- $\preceq$ is a total ordering
- $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ has a minimal element.
Proof
By definition of well-ordered, every subset of $S$, including $S$ itself, has a minimal element under $\preceq$.
So that covers the assertion that $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ has a minimal element.
Now consider $X = \left\{{a, b}\right\}$ where $a, b \in S$.
Because $S$ is well-ordered under $\preceq$, $X$ has a minimal element.
So either $\inf X = a$ or $\inf X = b$.
But by definition, $\inf X \le a$ or $\inf X \le b$.
So either $a \le b$ or $b \le a$.
That is, $a$ and $b$ are comparable.
We have shown that any arbitrarily selected elements $a$ and $b$ of $S$ are comparable.
So there are no non-comparable pairs in $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$.
Hence the ordering $\preceq$ is total.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory (1960)... (previous)... (next): $\S 17$: Well Ordering
- T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra (1975): $\S 7$: Exercise $4$