Henry Ernest Dudeney/Puzzles and Curious Problems/147 - Blindness in Bats/Solution
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Puzzles and Curious Problems by Henry Ernest Dudeney: $147$
- Blindness in Bats
- A naturalist was investigating (in a tediously long story) whether bats are in fact actually blind.
- He discovered that blindness varied.
- Two of his bats could see out of the right eye,
- just three of them could see out of the left eye,
- four could not see out of the left eye,
- and five could not see out of the right eye.
- He wanted to know the smallest number of bats that he could have examined in order to get these results.
Solution
The puzzlingly obvious solution is $7$.
One is left wondering whether this is a trick question, but no.
Proof
There must be at least $7$ bats, because they can be partitioned in $2$ ways::
- with or without sight in the right eye
- with or without sight in the left eye.
Both of these lead to $7$ bats.
That these conditions can be fulfilled by $7$ bats, let us suggest:
- $2$ bats can see out of both eyes
- $1$ bat can see out of the left eye but not the right
- $4$ can not see out of either eye
and the conditions are consistent.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1932: Henry Ernest Dudeney: Puzzles and Curious Problems ... (previous) ... (next): Solutions: $147$. -- Blindness in Bats
- 1968: Henry Ernest Dudeney: 536 Puzzles & Curious Problems ... (previous) ... (next): Answers: $219$. Blindness in Bats