Identity of Submonoid is not necessarily Identity of Monoid
Theorem
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a monoid whose identity is $e_S$.
Let $\struct {T, \circ}$ be a submonoid of $\struct {S, \circ}$ whose identity is $e_T$.
Then it is not necessarily the case that $e_T = e_S$.
Proof
Let $\struct {S, \times}$ be the semigroup formed by the set of order $2$ square matrices over the real numbers $R$ under (conventional) matrix multiplication.
Let $T$ be the subset of $S$ consisting of the matrices of the form $\begin{bmatrix} x & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$ for $x \in \R$.
From Matrices of the Form $\begin{bmatrix} x & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$ we have that $\struct {T, \times}$ is a subsemigroup of $\struct {S, \times}$.
From (some result somewhere) $\struct {S, \times}$ has an identity $\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ which is not in $\struct {T, \times}$.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: Find that result You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
However, note that:
\(\ds \begin{bmatrix} x & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \begin{bmatrix} x & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\) |
demonstrating that $\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$ is the identity of $\struct {T, \times}$.
$\blacksquare$
Also see
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {II}$: New Structures from Old: $\S 8$: Compositions Induced on Subsets
- 1978: Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 32.2$ Identity element and inverses