Principle of Finite Choice
Theorem
Let $I$ be a non-empty finite indexing set.
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an $I$-indexed family of non-empty sets.
Then there exists an $I$-indexed family $\family {x_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ such that:
- $\forall i \in I: x_i \in S_i$
That is, there exists a mapping:
- $\ds f: I \to \bigcup_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$
such that:
- $\forall i \in I: \map f i \in S_i$
Proof
We use the Principle of Mathematical Induction on the cardinality of $I$.
Basis for the Induction
Let $\card I = 1$.
Let $j \in I$.
Then $I = \set j$.
By the definition of a non-empty set, there exists an $x \in S_j$.
Hence, there exists a mapping $f: I \to S_j$ such that $\map f j = x$.
Since $\forall i \in I: i = j$, the result is indeed seen to hold for $\card I = 1$.
This is the basis for the induction
Induction Hypothesis
Assume that the theorem holds for all $I$ with $\card I = n$.
This is the induction hypothesis.
Induction Step
Now, suppose that $\card I = n + 1$.
Let $j \in I$.
Let $J = I \setminus \set j$.
By Cardinality Less One, $\card J = n$.
By the induction hypothesis, there exists a mapping:
- $\ds g: J \to \bigcup_{i \mathop \in J} S_i$
such that:
- $\forall i \in J: \map g i \in S_i$
By the definition of a non-empty set, there exists a $y \in S_j$.
Hence, there exists a mapping:
- $\ds f: I \to \bigcup_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$
such that:
- $\ds \forall i \in I: \map f i = \begin{cases} \map g i & : i \ne j \\ y & : i = j \end{cases}$
Then:
- $\forall i \in I: \map f i \in S_i$
as desired.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 15$: The Axiom of Choice
- 1973: Thomas J. Jech: The Axiom of Choice ... (previous) ... (next): $1.1$ The Axiom of Choice