Identity Mapping is Left Identity
Contents |
Theorem
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets.
Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping.
Then:
- $I_T \circ f = f$
where $I_T$ is the identity mapping on $T$, and $\circ$ signifies composition of mappings.
Proof 1
We use the definition of mapping equality, as follows:
Equality of Domains
The domains of $f$ and $I_T \circ f$ are equal from Domain of Composite Relation:
- $\operatorname{Dom} \left({I_T \circ f}\right) = \operatorname{Dom} \left({f}\right)$
Equality of Codomains
The codomains of $f$ and $f \circ I_S$ are also easily shown to be equal.
From Codomain of Composite Relation, the codomains of $I_T \circ f$ and $I_T$ are both equal to $T$.
But from the definition of the identity mapping, the codomain of $I_T$ is $\operatorname{Dom} \left({I_T}\right) = T$
Equality of Relations
The composite of $f$ and $I_T$ is defined as:
- $I_T \circ f = \left\{{\left({x, z}\right) \in S \times T: \exists y \in T: \left({x, y}\right) \in f \land \left({y, z}\right) \in I_T}\right\}$
But by definition of the identity mapping on $T$, we have that:
- $\left({y, z}\right) \in I_T \implies y = z$
Hence:
- $I_T \circ f = \left\{{\left({x, y}\right) \in S \times T: \exists y \in T: \left({x, y}\right) \in f \land \left({y, y}\right) \in I_T}\right\}$
But as $\forall y \in T: \left({y, y}\right) \in I_T$, this means:
- $I_T \circ f = \left\{{\left({x, y}\right) \in S \times T: \left({x, y}\right) \in f}\right\}$
That is:
- $I_T \circ f = f$
Hence the result.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
By definition, a mapping is also a relation.
Also by definition, the identity mapping is the same as the diagonal relation.
Thus Diagonal Relation is Left Identity can be applied directly.
$\blacksquare$
Also see
Sources
- Nathan Jacobson: Lectures in Abstract Algebra: I. Basic Concepts (1951): Introduction $\S 2$
- J.A. Green: Sets and Groups (1965)... (previous)... (next): $\S 3.5$: Example $52$
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965)... (previous)... (next): $\S 5$
- George McCarty: Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups (1967): $\text{I}$: Problem $\text{BB}$
- Allan Clark: Elements of Abstract Algebra (1971)... (previous)... (next): $\S 16$
- Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra (1978)... (previous)... (next): $\S 24.3 \ \text{(ii)}$
- John F. Humphreys: A Course in Group Theory (1996): $\S 2$: Definition $2.11$
- H. Jerome Keisler and Joel Robbin: Mathematical Logic and Computability (1996): Appendix $\text{A}.5$