Properties of Convergents of Continued Fractions
Contents |
Theorem
Let $\left[{a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots}\right]$ be a simple continued fraction.
Let $p_1, p_2, p_3, \ldots$ and $q_1, q_2, q_3, \ldots$ be its numerators and denominators.
Let $C_1, C_2, C_3, \ldots$ be the convergents of $\left[{a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots}\right]$.
Then the following results apply:
Difference between Adjacent Convergents
$p_k q_{k-1} - p_{k-1} q_k = \left({-1}\right)^k$, that is:
- $\displaystyle C_k - C_{k-1} = \frac {p_k} {q_k} - \frac {p_{k-1}} {q_{k-1}} = \frac {\left({-1}\right)^k} {q_k q_{k-1}}$
for $k \ge 2$;
Difference between Adjacent Convergents But One
$p_k q_{k-2} - p_{k-2} q_k = \left({-1}\right)^{k-1} a_k$, that is:
- $\displaystyle C_k - C_{k-2} = \frac {p_k} {q_k} - \frac {p_{k-2}} {q_{k-2}} = \frac {\left({-1}\right)^{k-1} a_k} {q_k q_{k-2}}$
for $k \ge 3$;
Convergents are Rationals in Canonical Form
- $p_k$ and $q_k$ are coprime for $k \ge 1$;
- $q_k > 0$ for $k \ge 1$.
Proof
Proof of Difference between Adjacent Convergents
Proof by induction:
For all $n \in \N^*: n \ge 2$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the proposition $p_n q_{n-1} - p_{n-1} q_n = \left({-1}\right)^n$.
Basis for the Induction
- $P(2)$ is the case where $p_1 = a_1, p_2 = a_1 a_2 + 1, q_1 = 1, q_2 = a_2$.
So $p_2 q_1 - p_1 q_2 = \left({a_1 a_2 + 1}\right) \times 1 - a_1 a_2 = 1 = \left({-1}\right)^2$.
So $P(2)$ holds. This is our basis for the induction.
Induction Hypothesis
- Now we need to show that, if $P \left({k}\right)$ is true, where $k \ge 2$, then it logically follows that $P \left({k+1}\right)$ is true.
So this is our induction hypothesis:
- $p_k q_{k-1} - p_{k-1} q_k = \left({-1}\right)^k$.
Then we need to show:
- $p_{k+1} q_k - p_k q_{k+1} = \left({-1}\right)^{k+1}$.
Induction Step
This is our induction step:
Consider $\left[{a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots, a_k, a_{k+1}}\right]$.
Its final numerator and denominator are by definition:
- $p_{k+1} = a_{k+1} p_k + p_{k-1}, q_{k+1} = a_{k+1} q_k + q_{k-1}$.
Therefore:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle p_{k+1} q_k - p_k q_{k+1}\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({a_{k+1} p_k + p_{k-1} }\right) q_k - p_k \left({a_{k+1} q_k + q_{k-1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle p_{k-1} q_k - p_k q_{k-1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({-1}\right) p_k q_{k-1} - p_{k-1} q_k\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({-1}\right) \left({-1}\right)^k\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | by the induction hypothesis | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({-1}\right)^{k+1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
So $P \left({k}\right) \implies P \left({k+1}\right)$ and the result follows by the Principle of Mathematical Induction.
Therefore:
- $\forall n \ge 2: p_n q_{n-1} - p_{n-1} q_n = \left({-1}\right)^n$
$\blacksquare$
Proof of Difference between Adjacent Convergents But One
This is a simple consequence of Difference between Adjacent Convergents above.
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle p_k q_{k-2} - p_{k-2} q_k\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({a_k p_{k-1} + p_{k-2} }\right) q_{k-2} - p_{k-2} \left({a_k q_{k-1} + q_{k-2} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle a_k \left({p_{k-1} q_{k-2} - p_{k-2} q_{k-1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle a_k \left({-1}\right)^{k-1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
$\blacksquare$
Proof that Convergents are Rationals in Canonical Form
This also follows directly from Difference between Adjacent Convergents above.
Let $d = \gcd \left\{{p_k, q_k}\right\}$.
Then $p_k q_{k-1} - p_{k-1} q_k$ is a multiple of $d$ from Common Divisor Divides Integer Combination.
So $d \backslash \left({-1}\right)^k$ and so $d = 1$.
Also note that $q_1 = 1$, and $a_k > 0$ for all $k \ge 2$.
So it follows that $q_k > 0$ for all $k \ge 1$ from definition of denominator.
Hence the result.
$\blacksquare$