Relation is Antisymmetric and Reflexive iff Intersection with Inverse equals Diagonal Relation

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $\RR \subseteq S \times S$ be a relation on a set $S$.


Then $\RR$ is both antisymmetric and reflexive if and only if:

$\RR \cap \RR^{-1} = \Delta_S$

where $\Delta_S$ denotes the diagonal relation.


Proof

Necessary Condition

Let $\RR$ be both antisymmetric and reflexive.

Then:

\(\ds \RR \cap \RR^{-1}\) \(\subseteq\) \(\ds \Delta_S\) Relation is Antisymmetric iff Intersection with Inverse is Coreflexive
\(\ds \RR\) \(\supseteq\) \(\ds \Delta_S\) Definition 2 of Reflexive Relation
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \RR^{-1}\) \(\supseteq\) \(\ds \Delta_S\) Inverse of Reflexive Relation is Reflexive
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \RR \cap \RR^{-1}\) \(\supseteq\) \(\ds \Delta_S\) Intersection is Largest Subset
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \RR \cap \RR^{-1}\) \(=\) \(\ds \Delta_S\) Definition 2 of Set Equality

$\Box$


Sufficient Condition

Let $\RR$ be such that:

$\RR \cap \RR^{-1} = \Delta_S$

Then by definition of set equality:

$\RR \cap \RR^{-1} \subseteq \Delta_S$

and so by Relation is Antisymmetric iff Intersection with Inverse is Coreflexive, $\RR$ is antisymmetric.


Also by definition of set equality:

$\Delta_S \subseteq \RR \cap \RR^{-1}$

By Intersection is Subset:

$\RR \cap \RR^{-1} \subseteq \RR$

By Subset Relation is Transitive:

$\Delta_S \subseteq \RR$

So, by definition, $\RR$ is reflexive.

$\blacksquare$}