Definition:Connection
Definition
Let $M$ be a differentiable manifold.
A connection on $M$ is a way of defining the parallelism of vectors.
It allows consistent differentiation everywhere on $M$, as it "connects" the various local coordinates of $M$.
Connection on Manifold
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold with or without boundary.
Let $\map {\mathfrak X} M$ be the space of smooth vector fields on $M$.
Let $\map {C^\infty} M$ be the space of smooth real functions on $M$.
Let $\nabla : \map {\mathfrak X} M \times \map {\mathfrak X} M \to \map {\mathfrak X} M$ be the map be written $\tuple {X, Y} \mapsto \nabla_X Y$ where $X, Y \in \map {\mathfrak X} M$, and $\times$ denotes the cartesian product.
Suppose $\forall f, f_1, f_2 \in \map {C^\infty} M$ and $\forall a_1, a_2 \in \R$ we have that $\nabla$ satisfies the following:
- $\nabla_{f_1 X_1 + f_2 X_2} Y = f_1 \nabla_{X_1} Y + f_2 \nabla_{X_2} Y$
- $\map {\nabla_X} {a_1 Y_1 + a_2 Y_2} = a_1 \nabla_X Y_1 + a_2 \nabla_X Y_2$
- $\map {\nabla_X} {f Y} = f \nabla_X Y + \paren {X f} Y$
Then $\nabla$ is known as the connection on $M$.
Koszul Connection
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold with or without boundary.
Let $E$ be a smooth manifold.
Let $\pi : E \to M$ be a smooth vector bundle.
Let $\map \Gamma E$ be the space of smooth sections of $E$.
This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: What kind of space do you mean? Is it not sufficient to say the set of sections of $E$? Or $\R$-vector space of ... ? You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Let $\map {\mathfrak{X}} M$ be the space of smooth vector fields on $M$.
This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: What kind of space do you mean? Is it not sufficient to say the set of smooth vector fields on $M$? You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Let $\map {C^\infty} M$ be the space of smooth real functions on $M$.
Let $\nabla : \map {\mathfrak{X}} M \times \map \Gamma E \to \map \Gamma E$ be the map be written $\tuple {X, Y} \mapsto \nabla_X Y$ where $X \in \map {\mathfrak{X}} M$, $Y \in \map \Gamma E$, and $\times$ denotes the cartesian product.
Suppose $\nabla$ satisfies the following:
\(\ds \nabla_{f_1 X_1 + f_2 X_2} Y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds f_1 \nabla_{X_1} Y + f_2 \nabla_{X_2} Y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \map {\nabla_X} {a_1 Y_1 + a_2 Y_2}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds a_1 \nabla_X Y_1 + a_2 \nabla_X Y_2\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \map {\nabla_X} {f Y}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds f \nabla_X Y + \paren {X f} Y\) |
where:
- $f, f_1, f_2 \in \map {C^\infty} M$
- $a_1, a_2 \in \R$
Then $\nabla$ is known as the connection in $E$.
Levi-Civita Connection
Let $\struct {M, g}$ be a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold with or without boundary.
Let $TM$ be the tangent bundle of $M$.
Let $\nabla$ be a connection on $TM$.
The validity of the material on this page is questionable. In particular: Does $\nabla$ not have to be a connection on $M$ according to the definition? $TM$ is another manifold. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by resolving the issues. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Questionable}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Suppose $\nabla$ is compatible with $g$ and symmetric.
Then $\nabla$ is called Levi-Civita connection.
Also see
- Results about connections can be found here.
Historical Note
The idea of a connection was investigated by Hermann Klaus Hugo Weyl in his efforts to unify the theory of relativity and that of electromagnetism.
Subsequently, connections were used in the study of vector bundles, and as a result have shown themselves to be basic to the development of gauge theory.
Sources
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): connection
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): connection