Dipper Relation is Congruence for Addition
Theorem
Let $m \in \N$ be a natural number.
Let $n \in \N_{>0}$ be a non-zero natural number.
Let $\RR_{m, n}$ be the dipper relation on $\N$:
- $\forall x, y \in \N: x \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } y \iff \begin {cases} x = y \\ m \le x < y \text { and } n \divides \paren {y - x} \\ m \le y < x \text { and } n \divides \paren {x - y} \end {cases}$
Then $\RR_{m, n}$ is a congruence relation for addition.
Proof
From Dipper Relation is Equivalence Relation we have that $\RR_{m, n}$ is an equivalence relation.
From Equivalence Relation is Congruence iff Compatible with Operation, it is sufficient to show that:
- $\forall x, y, z \in \N: x \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } y \implies \paren {x + z} \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } \paren {y + z}$
and:
- $\forall x, y, z \in \N: x \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } y \implies \paren {z + x} \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } \paren {z + y}$
Furthermore, because Natural Number Addition is Commutative, it is sufficient to demonstrate the first of these only.
So, let $x, y \in \N$ be such that:
- $x \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } y$
First let $x = y$.
We have that:
- $x = y \implies x + z = y + z$
and so:
- $\paren {x + z} \mathrel {\RR_{m, n} } \paren {y + z}$
Otherwise, we have that:
- $x \ne y$ and $x, y \ge m$
Without loss of generality, let $x < y$.
If not, then as $\RR_{m, n}$ is symmetric we can rename $x$ and $y$ as necessary.
\(\ds x\) | \(\RR_{m, n}\) | \(\ds y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds n\) | \(\divides\) | \(\ds \paren {y - x}\) | Definition of $\RR_{m, n}$ | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \exists k \in \N_{>0}: \, \) | \(\ds k n\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {y - x}\) | Definition of Divisor of Integer | |||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds k n\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {y + z - x - z}\) | as $\paren {y + z - x - z} = y - x$ | ||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {\paren {y + z} - \paren {x + z} }\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds n\) | \(\divides\) | \(\ds \paren {\paren {y + z} - \paren {x + z} }\) | Definition of Divisor of Integer | ||||||||||
\(\ds \paren {x + z}\) | \(\RR_{m, n}\) | \(\ds \paren {y + z}\) | Definition of $\RR_{m, n}$, as both $x + z \ge m$ and $y + z \ge m$ |
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {III}$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 16$: The Natural Numbers: Exercise $16.6 \ \text {(a)}$