Dot Product of Antiparallel Vectors is Negative
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\mathbf u$ and $\mathbf v$ be non-zero antiparallel vectors.
Then:
- $\mathbf u \cdot \mathbf v < 0$
where $\cdot$ denotes dot product.
Proof
We have by hypothesis that $\mathbf u$ and $\mathbf v$ are antiparallel.
Hence we can define $\mathbf u$ and $\mathbf v$ as:
\(\ds \mathbf u\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \mathbf i + y \mathbf j + z \mathbf k\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \mathbf v\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {-x} \mathbf i + \paren {-y} \mathbf j + \paren {-z} \mathbf k\) |
where $x$, $y$ and $z$ are arbitrary real numbers such that at least one of $x$, $y$ and $z$ is not zero.
By definition of dot product:
\(\ds \mathbf u \cdot \mathbf v\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \paren {-x} + y \paren {-y} + z \paren {-z}\) | Definition of Dot Product | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds -\paren {x^2 + y^2 + z^2}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(<\) | \(\ds 0\) | as $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 > 0$ |
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): antiparallel vectors
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): antiparallel vectors