Equivalence of Definitions of Unique Existential Quantifier/Definition 2 iff Definition 3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
The following definitions of the concept of Unique Existential Quantifier are equivalent:
Definition 2
There exists a unique object $x$ such that $\map P x$, denoted $\exists ! x: \map P x$, if and only if:
- $\exists x : \forall y : \paren {\map P y \iff x = y}$
Definition 3
There exists a unique object $x$ such that $\map P x$, denoted $\exists ! x: \map P x$, if and only if both:
- $\exists x : \map P x$
and:
- $\forall y : \forall z : \paren {\paren {\map P y \land \map P z} \implies y = z }$
Proof
Suppose Definition 2, that for some $x$:
- $(1): \quad \forall y : \paren {\map P y \iff x = y}$
Taking $y = x$ yields:
- $x = x \implies \map P x$
implying that $\exists x : \map P x$.
Suppose $\map P y$ and $\map P z$ for arbitrary $y$ and $z$.
Then from $(1)$, $y = x$ and $z = x$, giving:
- $\forall y : \forall z : \paren {\paren {\map P y \land \map P z} \implies y = z}$
Suppose Definition 3, that:
- $(1): \quad \exists x : \map P x$
and for arbitrary $y$ and $z$:
- $(2): \quad \paren { \map P y \land \map P z } \implies y = z$
From $(2)$, take $z = x$:
- $\paren {\map P y \land \map P x} \implies y = x$
Thus, by $(1)$:
- $\map P y \implies x = y$
Suppose $x = y$.
From $(1)$, $\map P x$, yielding:
- $x = y \implies \map P y$
Thus:
- $\exists x : \forall y : \paren {\map P y \iff x = y}$
$\blacksquare$