Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for 1st Order IVPs
Theorem
Let $x' = f(t,x)$, $x(t_0) = x_0$ be an explicit ODE of dimension $n$.
Suppose that there exists a neighborhood $V = [t_0 - \ell_0,t_0 + \ell_0] \times \overline{B}(x_0,\epsilon)$ of $(t_0,x_0)$ in phase space $\R \times \R^n$ such that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous on $V$.
Then there exists $\ell < \ell_0$ such that there exists a unique solution $x(t)$ defined for $t \in [t_0 - \ell,t_0 + \ell]$.
Proof
For $0 < \ell < \ell_0$, let $\mathcal X = \mathcal C([t_0 - \ell,t_0 + \ell]; \R^n)$ endowed with the sup norm be the Banach space of continuous functions $[t_0 - \ell,t_0 + \ell] \to \R^n$.
By Fixed Point Formulation of Explicit ODEs it is sufficient to find a fixed point of the map $T : \mathcal X \to \mathcal X$ defined by:
- $\displaystyle (Tx)(t) = x_0 + \int_{t_0}^t f(s,x(s))\ ds$
We also have that a closed subset of a complete metric space is complete.
Therefore the Banach Fixed-Point Theorem it is sufficient to find a non-empty subset $\mathcal Y \subseteq \mathcal X$ such that:
- $\mathcal Y$ is closed in $\mathcal X$
- $T\mathcal Y \subseteq \mathcal Y$
- $T$ is a contraction on $\mathcal Y$
First note that $V$ is closed and bounded, hence compact by the Heine-Borel Theorem.
Therefore since $f$ is continuous, by the extreme value theorem, the maximum $\displaystyle m = \sup_{(t,x) \in V}| f(t,x)|$ exists and is finite.
Let $\kappa$ be the Lipschitz constant of $f$, and:
- $\mathcal Y = \{ y \in \mathcal X : |y(t) - x_0 | \leq m |t - t_0|\ \forall t \in [t_0-\ell,t_0 + \ell]\}$
the cone in $\mathcal X$ centred at $(t_0,x_0)$.
Clearly $\mathcal Y$ is closed in $\mathcal X$.
Also for $y \in \mathcal Y$ we have:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \left\vert (Ty)(t) - x_0 \right\vert\) | \(\leq\) | \(\displaystyle \left\vert \int_{t_0}^t f(s,y(s))\ ds \right\vert\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\leq\) | \(\displaystyle m\int_{t_0}^t\ ds\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | By Absolute Value of Definite Integral | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle m\vert t - t_0 \vert\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
Therefore $T\mathcal Y \subseteq \mathcal Y$.
Finally we must show that $T$ is a contraction on $\mathcal Y$ (we will find that this restricts our choice of $\ell$).
Let $y_1,y_2 \in \mathcal Y$. We have:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \left\vert (Ty_1)(t) - (Ty_2)(t) \right\vert\) | \(\leq\) | \(\displaystyle \left\vert \int_{t_0}^t f(s,y_1(s)) - f(s,y_2(s)) \ ds \right\vert\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\leq\) | \(\displaystyle \int_{t_0}^t \vert f(s,y_1(s)) - f(s,y_2(s)) \vert \ ds\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | By Absolute Value of Definite Integral | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\leq\) | \(\displaystyle \kappa \int_{t_0}^t \vert y_1(t) - y_2(t) \vert \ ds\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | By the Lipschitz property | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\leq\) | \(\displaystyle \kappa \vert t-t_0\vert \Vert y_1 - y_2 \Vert_{\text{sup} }\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | By the Estimation Lemma |
Taking the supremum over $t$ we have $\| Ty_1 - Ty_2 \|_{\text{sup}} \leq \kappa \ell \| y_1 - y_2 \|_{\text{sup}}$ for all $y_1,y_2 \in \mathcal Y$.
Therefore choosing $\ell < \kappa^{-1}$, $T$ is a contraction on $\mathcal Y$ as required.
This completes the proof.
$\blacksquare$